Changing Our Language for the Next Generation
LG has a website designed (http://www.lgdtxtr.com/) to aid parents as they attempt to decode the cryptic messages that teenagers are sending via text messaging. The site claims that the average teen texts over 1,700 times a month, so a text decoder like this may be truly appreciated by parents struggling to understand and communicate with their teen.
I am of the "younger generation" and I am a multi-tasker. However, I have always felt that holding four conversations while I am making my grocery list, driving to class, and finishing up homework has always been a bit much for me. I don't understand how teens can possibly pay attention to someone talking while they are texting several other people, but far be it from me to underestimate today's youth.
But all that is beside the point.The real issue here is why we feel the need to pressure our kids to always be going and always be connnected, even to the point of permanetly attaching a cellphone to their palms early in life and equiping them with their own language in which to communicate. As if the generation gap wasn't big enough already!
Still, I feel the question has to be begged...is hurrying our children and altering our language in an attempt to be constantly "connected" an abmirable quest? And do we really believe that accomplishing this will provide us with a good life (afterall LG's campaign is "life's good")?
IMHO (in my humble opinion) I don't believe that a text decoder is needed as much as a phone free evening at home where teens, and parents, put aside their phones and comunicate without text.
Betsy Molloy
Betsy Molloy is currently finishing her Bachelor's of Arts in Communication Studies at Elmhurst College, in Elmhurst, Illinois. She is passionate about youth ministry, currently working as the Website Content and Internet Marketing Specialist for Called to Youth Ministry. Betsy also works in her church youth group with Greg, her soon to be husband.





Comments
Nate, I totally agree. First
Nate, I totally agree.
First off, as someone who loves language I find myself cringing at the manner with which some of my students use the written word. It's not so much the idea of using acronyms and such, see how stenographers and others have used shorthand as a means of effective communication, as it is the degradation of the language itself. Now, quite obviously, the calling of this 'degradation' is a perspectival judgement, but isn't it interesting how much this situation mirrors the 'ebonics' craze of the mid-nineties? (N.B. The term 'ebonics' is now eschewed for the less derogatory 'African American Vernacular English', of which there is at least one academic resource http://bit.ly/8GFE2l ) Thus, our reactions to this trend might well be informed by past reactions to other language adjustments and trends.
All of this to say, I find that with increased quantity of any kind there is a proportional decrease in quality. We see this to be the case in the information glut offered by the internet. The world is at our fingers, but we understand less. The classic the more you know, the more you know you don't know. Or as the poet/rapper K'naan wrote:
The same holds true for personal connection. The greater the quantity of personal connections the proportional lack of quality of connection exists as well.
I wouldn't go back to ways of the past, but we've got to figure out how to make deep and lasting relational connections in a world of passing tweets and status updates.
Sorry Betsy, I can't believe
Sorry Betsy, I can't believe I posted Nate's name of that response. Chalk it up to a rookie blog commenter mistake...
(repenting in sackcloth and ashes)
Post new comment